Sign In
HomeHealth PromotionEconomic Impact of Packaged Liquor Licences
Economic Impact of Packaged Liquor Licences


NSLHD Hero Image Desktop

NSLHD Health Promotion is a key partner in the ‘Economic Impact of Liquor Licences’ project. The project is a collaboration between the lead research institute, Deakin University, Central Coast Local Health District, The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre and NSLHD Health Promotion.

What is the issue?

Alcohol is a harmful, toxic and addictive substance that causes many health conditions, injuries and deaths. Alcohol use is linked to 29 diseases and​ injuries, mainly​​ various cancers and transport accidents but also cardiovascular diseases, suicide and self-inflicted injuries. In Australia, 4,090 deaths (4.09% of all deaths) were attributable to alcohol consumption in 2018 and 4.46% of the overall health burden was attributable to alcohol use. This health burden is costly with one study finding alcohol consumption attributable to $18.17 billion of tangible costs in Australia in 2017-18. There is also another $48.7 billion in economic costs when the value of health loss is taken into account.  

The social effects of alcohol

The evidence suggests there are many health, social and other benefits to restricting alcohol availability and access particularly through reducing the number of licensed outlets in an area and restricting the trading hours of licensed venues. Key benefits include reductions in alcohol consumption, alcohol-related violence and assaults, emergency department presentations, as well as injuries and motor vehicle crashes. Despite the large amount of evidence on health and social outcomes, there were no economic studies found in the literature relating to alcohol licensing in Australia.

Liquor licensing in NSW

As a mandatory stakeholder, NSW Health assesses the health impact of potential licences and makes recommendations to the Liquor Licensing Authority. There is currently limited economic evidence that local communities and health authorities can use to support their recommendations when responding to new liquor licence applications.

How will the project address the issue?

This project proposes to utilise an economic modelling approach to undertake a cost impact analysis of liquor licences in NSW, establishing both the unit cost and total cost of alcohol-related harms to a local area. Northern Sydney Local Health District, together with the Central Coast Local Health District, Deakin Health Economics and the Australian Partnership Prevention Centre, will analyse international evidence on the associations between packaged liquor outlet density and harms with NSW-specific data on local area characteristics from national, state or local administrative data, such as the Australian Urban Observatory, NSW Health, Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, and Liquor and Gaming NSW.

What are the expected outcomes?

  • Strengthen NSW Health responses to liquor licence applications by accurately estimating the economic costs to the community.
  • Support health, not-for-profit organisations and the community to more effectively review the impact of liquor licence applications in local communities.
  • Identify any potential thresholds at which the health costs of liquor licences outweigh the economic benefits.
  • Help fill the gap in evidence around the economic and health costs of liquor licencing decisions.
  • Potential integration into the liquor licencing decision-making system to support the Independent Liquor & Gaming Authority with liquor licensing decisions.
  • Support potential licence applicants identify more appropriate locations to establish a packaged liquor outlet, which is less likely to generate harm for a local community.

What is the relevance for policy and practice?

The findings of the analysis will enable NSW Health to identify the costs associated with packaged liquor licences at a local level, with consideration of the broader economic contributions generated by the liquor industry. It is hoped this evidence will strengthen the quality of objective responses to packaged liquor licence applications, improving health outcomes for the community.

This project is sup​​​ported by a collaboration of researchers and policy makers from Northern Sydney Local Health District, Central Coast Local Health District, the Australian Partnership Prevention Centre, Deakin University and the NSW Ministry of Health.

For more information visit The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre ​alternate text 47

Alcohol Related Harms Costing Model - User Guide

​In the user guide video below, lead researcher Paul Crosland provides an overview of the Alcohol Related Harms Costing Model and demonstrates its functionality. This tutorial assists approved users navigate through the various tabs and access the relevant datasets for their relevant local government area. 

All requests for access to the model can be made via email to​ ​

​Further Reading & References

Memorandum of Understanding

For organisations coming on-board, the following memorandum of understanding (MOU) template is used as an agreement on the permitted use of the tool and responsibilities of stakeholders

  1. Crosland P, Angeles MR, Ananthapavan J. 2022. alternate text 48Economic costs of alcohol-related harms in New South Wales: Development of an interactive costing tool. The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. November 2022.
  2. World Health Organization. Global status report on alcohol and health 2018. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2018.  Global Status report on alcohol and health 2018​​
  3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australian Burden of Disease Study 2018. Canberra2021.
  4. Murray CJL, Aravkin AY, Zheng P, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abbasi-Kangevari M, et al. Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1223-49. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30752-2
  5. Whetton S, Tait RJ, Gilmore W, Dey T, Agramunt S, Halim SA, et al. Examining the social and economic costs of alcohol use in Australia: 2017-18. Perth, WA: Curtin University; 2021.   
  6. Australian Bureau of Statistics. National Health Survey 2017-18. 2018.
  7. National Health and Medical Research Council. Australian guidelines to reduce health risks for drinking alcohol. Canberra; 2020.   
  8. Crosland P, Howse E, Heenan M, Asfia SM, Dona SWA, Angeles MR, et al. The value of primary prevention of alcohol consumption. An Evidence Check rapid review brokered by the Sax Institute for the Centre for Alcohol and Other Drugs, NSW Ministry of Health. (Under Review). Sydney: The Australian Prevention Partnership Centre; 2022.   
  9. Crosland P, Ananthapavan J, Davison J, Lambert M, Carter R. The economic cost of preventable disease in Australia: a systematic review of estimates and methods. Australian and New Zealand journal of public health. 2019;43(5):484-95. doi:10.1111/1753-6405.12925
  10. Li Ian W, Si J. Alcohol industry and governmental revenue from young Australians. Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association. 2016;40(5):519-25. doi:10.1071/AH15146
  11. Cancer Council WA. Alcohol use in Western Australia, drinking patterns and harms. 2021.
  12. Smith J, Whetton S, d'Abbs P. The social and economic costs and harms of alcohol consumption in the NT. Darwin, Northern Territory: Menzies School of Health Research; 2019.   
  13. Deeming S, Kypri K. Costing alcohol-related assault in the night-time economy from a societal perspective: The case of Central Sydney. Drug and Alcohol Review. 2021;40(5):779-99. doi:​0.1111/dar.13242 alternate text 47
  14. Robinson E, Nguyen P, Jiang H, Livingston M, Ananthapavan J, Lal A, et al. Increasing the Price of Alcohol as an Obesity Prevention Measure: The Potential Cost-Effectiveness of Introducing a Uniform Volumetric Tax and a Minimum Floor Price on Alcohol in Australia. Nutrients. 2020;12(3). doi:10.3390/nu12030603
  15. Ananthapavan J, Sacks G, Brown V, Moodie M, Nguyen P, Barendregt J, et al. Assessing Cost-Effectiveness of Obesity Prevention Policies in Australia 2018 (ACE-Obesity Policy). Melbourne, Australia: Deakin University; 2018.​
  16. Burton R, Henn C, Lavoie D, O'Connor R, Perkins C, Sweeney K, et al. A rapid evidence review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of alcohol control policies: an English perspective. Lancet. 2017;389(10078):1558-80. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32420-5
  17. OECD. Tackling harmful alcohol use economics and public health policy. 2015.   
  18. Navarro HJ, Shakeshaft A, Doran CM, Petrie DJ. Does increasing community and liquor licensees' awareness, police activity, and feedback reduce alcohol-related violent crime? A benefit-cost analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2013;10(11):5490-506. doi:10.3390/ijerph10115490 alternate text 48